Did Dennis Rodman change how teams value hustle defense?

Did Dennis Rodman alter the value teams place on hustle defense? This question strikes to the heart of the basketball world. A legendary figure in the sport, Rodman is not just known for his over-the-top persona. He was a court dominator, a guy who hustled like few others, knocked down boards as well as anyone in history, and was a ferocious defender. Evaluating his impact on the NBA is kind of a neat trick. There aren’t too many like him, past or present, and he’s one of the top 20 players of all time.

The Evolution of Defensive Metrics

The basketball defense has progressed a lot since Rodman’s peak in the prime of 1990. Usually, appearance like points given up per game and the percentage of opposing field goals go in were the main benchmarks of how good you were on defense. But as the NBA really got into its whole analytical phase, teams started to care about advanced stats that put a spotlight on the good energy and effort parts of playing defense.

As an illustration, defensive rebounds took on a new importance. Rodman achieved the incredible feat of averaging 13.1 rebounds per game for his career, and he led the league in that stat an amazing seven times. Moreover, he wasn’t just lucky or skilled in grabbing wayward balls; he had an instinct for where to be when the shot went up. He positioned himself with such intelligence and effort that it had to make any offensive coach rethink his life choices.

In addition, hustle stats came into being, offering a clearer picture of the energy players expend. They give context to stats like the number of shots taken by an opponent, which might look good on paper, but might not mean much if the guy taking them is not doing a very good job of it. And they offer context for a didn’t-see-it/ can’t-see-it kind of part of the game that often isn’t part of a boxed score.

Impact on Team Strategies

The issue is this: Did Dennis Rodman convert how teams prize hustle defense? To come at it from a different angle, let’s consider some of the outer aspects of Rodman’s peculiar playing style. His top-tier teams had something in common: They were all great defensive units. As a player, Rodman’s top-of-the-line skill was what folks in the trade like to call “rebounding.” Of his many great rebounding games, one stands out.

The teams Rodman played for, including the Chicago Bulls and Detroit Pistons, were the sort that thrived on aggressive defense. The Bulls, for example, won three consecutive championships from 1996 to 1998. Their defensive rating during that stretch was consistently among the best in the league. But this was not just some happy coincidence. The kind of hustle defense that Rodman embodied was critical to their winning.

1996 Bulls: Topped the league with a 101.8 defensive rating.
Bulls of 1997: They further tightened their defensive rating to 100.2.
The 1998 Bulls: Retained a robust defensive rating of 102.8.

Further, Rodman’s impact was felt in more places than just teams. Coaches like Phil Jackson and Chuck Daly saw the worth of hustle defense and wove it into their strategies. This opened the way for teams after them to place a similar value on hustle in their defenses.

Redefining Defensive Roles

Prior to Rodman, players had well-defined roles; the guys who got the points got the points, and the guys who stopped the other guys from getting points did just that. But Rodman was a player who could impact a game without scoring. He could get in the way of a shot and make it a miss, get a rebound almost out of nowhere, or snatch it right off an opponent’s hands before they even knew what was happening. He could also play the passing lanes and make a steal when you least expected it. In short, Rodman did it all on D.

Consider Draymond Green and Marcus Smart as two recent examples. Their playing styles reflect the legacy of Dennis Rodman. Green’s been called a “defensive catalyst” (and let’s be honest, when is he not on some kind of “defensive team”?), yet his defensive value isn’t just his ability to guard and work against players on the other team; it is, and has long been, his ability to guard with the kind of tenacity and versatility that doesn’t just echo Rodman’s impact on the game, but is also (and perhaps even more so) impressionable in its own right.

Also, the success of Rodman proved that hustle could make the difference in winning and losing games. Coaches started looking for players who had grit and determination, i.e., guys who could and would work hard (enough) on the court to produce results. This was something that talent evaluators and coaches both could see and appreciate. And now, with the palaver of talent and hard work that usually precedes a team’s next little trophy, we find ourselves at the end of this narrative. Hustle is a notion we evaluate talent by.

Modern-Day Approach to Hustle Defense

Modern teams have adopted analytics to an even greater degree. Defensive metrics now reflect determination (or “hustle”) in ways that were not considered during Rodman’s time. The ascendance of advanced analytics has further illuminated the value of that not-easy-to-define quality. Teams scrutinize a player’s defensive stats more closely than ever before.

In addition, the conditioning and effort of the players are now prioritized in training. Coaching has taken on Rodman’s ethos of maximum effort in every possession for every player. This has resulted in better teams and more intense, competitive basketball.

Presently, players who perform very well in hustle metrics make for outstanding contributors to their teams. We have actually seen a direct increase in players taking on positions that specialize in defensive roles (and mostly in the backcourt) over the past several years, leading to a greater respect for those who can play “hustle defense.” Indeed, teams that prioritize these personnel decisions often find themselves playing deep into the postseason.

Conclusion

In closing, the question posed at the beginning of this chapter is straightforward: Did Dennis Rodman impact how teams evaluate hustle defense? The short answer is yes. Of course, Rodman’s mix of speed and strength (not to mention his uniquely wiry physique) was a huge factor in his individual brilliance as a rebounder and, ultimately, as a defender. But the two-time NBA Defensive Player of the Year changed the way teams think about hustle defense. Defense is largely about effort, and Rodman offered a funnel for all that to come through. No player better epitomized the notion of using one’s energy to change the course of play.

Explore More on us

Discover insightful blogs on our Blogging Space, check our SoloStat Score Explanation, and learn more about NBA All-Defensive Team.